take action

mindset blog

Go Home on Time Day – seriously not taken seriously

Mindset Group - Friday, December 04, 2009

National ‘Go home on time day’ occurred last Wednesday (25th of November), and while the day managed to grab some great pre-event support from workers and employers, on the day it wasn’t taken so seriously.

The pre-event press – which included coverage on major Fairfax news websites including The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and The Brisbane Times - quite clearly discussed the ‘overworked’ sentiments held by Australian workers from every industry.

And The Australia Institute, the event’s organiser, didn’t just have worker sentiment on their side. A report they released pre-event showed that on average a full time Australian employee works 70 minutes of unpaid overtime a day, which adds up to 2.14 billion hours, or $72 billion, in unpaid work every year – which equates to 6% of our economy.

Josh Fear, report co-author said, “Ultimately, managers and business owners have a responsibility to create an environment in which employees can work reasonable hours without risking their career, their health or their relationships.” 

And so employees made the pledge to “Go Home On Time” on November 25th collecting a ‘leave pass’ from the site – 20,000 employees in total.

However, post-event articles which appeared on The Sydney Morning Herald and HR industry publication Human Resources Leader showed the follow-through figures don’t look quite so good. 

A follow-up survey conducted the following day with 2,400 pledged participants showed that only 55% left work on time.  

The most common reasons cited by the 45% who didn’t keep their promise were: 
• having too much to do (68%), 
• colleagues were working late (11%), 
• forgot to go home on time (7%) and 
• the boss made them stay late (7%).

Clearly the results show Australia hasn’t quite learned to take the concept of going home on time seriously.

Are you praising your employees?

Mindset Group - Thursday, November 26, 2009

Smart Company has reported on a new survey involving 3,053 employees that found that 62% of employees believe their managers are “Very Poor”, “Poor” or just “Satisfactory” at offering praise to their employees. 

It is important to praise employees for a job well done. Managers need to make the time to recognise their people, especially in tough economic times where employees are often taking on extra responsibilities. It is essential for an employee to know their managers are supporting them and recognising their extra efforts.  

52 percent of employees surveyed said that this lack of recognition will play a huge part in their decision to leave an organisation, and 28 percent would leave if they were not receiving any recognition at all.

Other key findings from the survey relating to managers include:
  • Managers don't know their people - two thirds of employees, across all generations are convinced their managers don't know what motivates them to be more productive, proving managers need to take the time to get to know what inspires and drives their people.
  • Employees lose out when recognition is up to the Manager - 70% of employees say the level of praise they receive from their manager depends on the priorities of the manager and the manager's style, and only 30 percent receive praise because it is company policy. 
  • Praise is not frequent enough - One in five employees does not receive any praise at all or at best, it only happens once per year.
  • Recognition means the most from the manager - close to half of employees surveyed want to be recognised directly by their manager on a one on one basis. 
  • This was followed by 37% who want a combination of recognition in front of their team, the entire company, one to one with the manager, and privately over email or a hand written note.

How to emerge from the GFC as a leading employer

Mindset Group - Thursday, June 11, 2009

HR Daily has published an article about how to emerge from the GFC as a leading employer and how important authenticity, integrity, transparency and substance is for your company. 

Executive bonuses will tumble and "people factors" come to the fore as leading employers emerge from the global financial crisis, according to a new book on organisational change.

"One of the impacts of the GFC has been the investor angst and community outrage concerning the payment of obscene bonuses to some executives," says corporate psychologist Colin Beames in Transforming Organisational Human Capital (ISBN 9780980644203).

"People are now no longer in the mood to tolerate hypocrisy, lack of transparency and actions that promote blatant self-interest.

"The pendulum is shifting back in favour of authenticity, integrity, transparency and 'substance' over 'spin'."

In a post-GFC world, Beames says, the shareholder will no longer be king.

Performance standards that push for risk-taking and expediency will be discouraged, he says, and the fixation on short-term profits will necessarily diminish as stakeholders are forced to adopt a more sustainable perspective.

"Investors will come to realise that it is the less tangible and constantly evolving people factors that are increasingly the drivers of value and the developers of competitive capacity."

People management, accordingly, will become a core operational process - as opposed to a support function - as talent emerges as the key corporate asset, Beames says.

Employers restructuring - or leaping into the fire

According to Beames, the current economic climate provides CEOs and executives with a perfect opportunity to restructure, outsource non-core activities and discard unsustainable business models or unprofitable products and services.

"It provides them with legitimacy for change and possibly the pursuit of new opportunities."

Some employers, however, have leapt from the frying pan into the fire, Beames says, with impulsive and uncoordinated responses to the downturn, including:

  • the slash and burn approach to labour cost-cutting, in which employees in more critical, specialist or core roles are let go as the result of an arbitrary percentage decrease;
  • indiscriminate outsourcing, resulting in the loss of relationship capital (between the company and its clients), critical skills, intellectual property and "coal face" control;
  • ad hoc employee-benefit cuts, such as the axing of flexible work arrangements, which lead to disengagement;
    recruitment freezes, resulting in the neglect of critical roles or a drop in performance due to the redeployment of unsuitable people; and
  • the "peanut butter" (or spread evenly) approach to salary cuts, encouraging high performers to seek employment elsewhere.

The crisis, Beames says, has left an "indelible footprint" on the corporate culture, and employers must play by a new set of rules.

He says the age of "short termism", or get-rich-quick schemes, is over, and that sustainability will hinge on assessing and mitigating risk and more stringent corporate governance.

The "cult" of the CEO - which Beames describes as "a simplistic and convenient perspective where the CEO's impact on an organisation's success is accorded more weight than it deserves" - will be replaced by a focus on the team, and compensation systems will be overhauled so that executive pay is aligned with sustainable profits.

The current debate over proposed legislation to limit extravagant remuneration practices (such as excessive executive termination payments, see related article) is "clear evidence of the winds of change", he says.

The future of management

The traditional work of management will be performed less by managers as employers transform post-crisis, Beames says.

"It will be pushed out more to the periphery and embedded in systems via technology," he says.

"Decision making will be more peer-based with power based on competence, and less on authority vested in organisational structures."

Managers will have to earn authority, he says.

HR managers and other leaders must employ a more collaborative, transparent, and respectful approach in order to motivate staff.

"The hope is that more enlightened approaches to managing people will be adopted," Beames says.

"Irrespective of their status, one universal should prevail - that of treating all employees with honesty and respect."

recent posts

tags

archive