take action

mindset blog

Inadequate leadership the real cause of the GFC?

Mindset Group - Wednesday, November 18, 2009

The Human Resources Leader has reported that inadequate business models and failed leadership were major factors leading to the global financial crisis.  In order to prevent this process from recurring again, questions have been raised about the fundamentals of leadership and how they must change.

What is HR’s role in changing leadership?
According to Harvard Professor Bill George and the CEO of Lloyds International David Smith,  the HR department should be central in building a long-term leadership culture in a sustainable environment.

It is the human resources department’s job to build the leadership today – and for the future – he says, and to build the culture of the company. However George also says that the CEO needs to be the real chief human resources officer and that there is no substitution for face-to-face interaction.

“They should take the leadership role, they can’t just del egate this like they would to an accountant on how to keep the books,” he says. “The CEO must be the role model that he or she wants reflected in the organisation. And then that person must be out and about with the people at all levels and not just dealing with people at a board level,” says George.

Smith says that HR practitioners need to influence the discussions that take place, have lasting influence on the commercial terms of the business and be part and parcel of the top team.

“HR [practitioners], in a very sophisticated way, have tentacles into all the decisions of the business and I think that must be made clear to everybody,” says Smith. 

“If one accepts the theory that the world has changed on the back of the GFC – maybe not forever, but certainly in the medium term – I think the way that we design our com pensation schemes, our incentive schemes and the way we motivate and lead people will be different. And I think that thought leadership in part should be led by our HR col leagues,” he says.

Proactive, says Smith, is an essential word in the process for HR, as is strategy. He says that the role of HR isn’t just about responding to people’s queries, but is a much more proactive role.

“It’s about taking that step forward, – thinking about where we’ve come from, thinking about where we want to go and [how to] influence leaders across all levels of the business.”

What can be done now?
Now is the best time for HR departments and executives to turn leadership on its head and make steps forward to being leaders of the future. This will not mean going back to previous practices, George says, but developing new strategies and a whole new mindset as to what it means to lead a company.

First, he says, leaders need to develop themselves as leaders and this comes from experience. He emphasises the importance of dealing with a crisis as one of the best lessons in leadership.

“There is no better test,” he says. “You can do all the simulation you want, you can do all the case studies, you can analyse how other leaders did – but there’s nothing that substitutes doing it yourself.”

George advocates that HR leaders take the top potential leaders of the future and get them involved in line assignments where they have to face a crisis and perform. He believes it is only through this that they can make mistakes and learn.

He remains adamant that all good leaders will demonstrate the ability to plan ahead while formulating policy that is positive now. “We should promote leaders who have that long-term view of the world, long-term vision and are willing to make that long term commitment and not trying to make quick-fix solutions,” he says. “If we have leaders who are just looking for a quick fix we’re going to be right back in this problem in five years.”

Two-thirds of workers disengaged, exodus looming

Mindset Group - Wednesday, October 21, 2009

The HR Daily have written an article explaining that nearly two in three workers  are at risk of fleeing their jobs with the next 12 months. They say that there is a large proportion of the workforce with potentially itchy feet. Now that the job market shows signs of recovery, those people will feel more confident about making a move elsewhere.

"People systems" and leaders falling short
The HR Daily article follows the release of Organisational Effectiveness and Employee Engagement, a Right Management report based on a survey of nearly 29,000 workers from around the world.

It reveals that fewer than one in two employees believe they work in an organisation with the "people systems" and leaders capable of driving the "right behaviours", and only 54 per cent think their company has a "positive culture".

In Australia, some 36 per cent of workers are "committed to making the organisation a success", compared to 11 per cent in Japan, 43 per cent in New Zealand and 44 per cent in the US.

The transport, storage and communication sector has the lowest engagement levels (at 30%), followed by manufacturing (32%) and the retail trade (33%).

Mining has the highest engagement rates (48%), followed, at a distant second, by finance, insurance and business services (38%).

Tellingly, the survey also reveals a strong relationship between high levels of disengagement and low levels of perceived customer satisfaction, making it particularly difficult for employers to execute or achieve "steady business results".

Employers must strive to "engage and delight"
Employers must continuously "search for new and better ways to engage employees" and "delight customers and stakeholders", the report states.

But business leaders "have a long way to go to align and engage their employees to their strategy".

According to Beattie, engagement levels in Australia have been steadily declining over the last four years (from 38.1% in 2005 to 35.7% in December 2008).

"This decline in engagement isn't surprising, given the sense of dislocation during the global financial crisis," she says.

"However, it is concerning. Research has consistently shown that employee engagement is powerfully linked to a range of success factors, including productivity, customer satisfaction and staff retention.

"Employers battling their way out of the downturn really need to get it right. When the economy is tight... companies are even more dependent on the discretionary effort of their people; they need them to do more than simply turn up."

According to the report, engagement - or the degree of employee/organisational alignment - is driven by the skill, alacrity and support of leaders, customer relationships, training investment and competitive pay.

Achieving a truly engaged workforce, it says, hinges on "investing in the selection and development of capable leaders, employees' learning and development and getting reward systems right".

Employers must strive for "a 'fit for purpose' organisational structure where people understand what is expected of them and what they are accountable for".

This, in turn, should create a positive workplace culture, it says, in which the "systems, symbols and behaviours that leaders and other employees are exposed to" are aligned with the business strategy.

recent posts

tags

archive